• About
    • Posting
    • Media Mentions
    • Desiderata
  • History
    • Vandercook Timeline
    • Vandercook Employee Roster
      • Employee Photos
    • Vandercook Dealers
    • Centenary Gallery
      • Bundle Participants
    • Genealogy
  • Literature
    • Book
    • Articles
      • A Short History of Vandercook
      • The Vandercook Archive
      • The Vandercook in Context
      • Common Vandercook Operator Errors
      • Edition Printing on the Cylinder Proof Press
      • Adjusting Cylinder Carriage Bearings …
      • Cleanliness Will Cut the Costs
      • Lock-Up
    • Vandercook Patents
    • Bibliography
  • Tables
    • Model Index
    • Quick Specs
    • Features
    • Serial Numbers
    • Press Inspectors
  • Maintenance
    • Workshops
    • Presses for Sale
      • Links
    • Glossary
  • Census
    • Vandercook Gravity Press Census
  • Other Brands
    • Other Brands Censuses
      • Asbern Census
      • Canuck Census
      • Challenge Census
        • Challenge Patents
      • Hacker Census
        • Hacker Patents
      • FAG Census
      • Korrex Census
      • Potter Census
      • Reprex Census
      • Western Census
  • Contact
« ID this proof press!
Manual for Uni I (#20234) »

Feedboard Feedback

Posted October 10, 2006 by Duncan Dempster   1 views    3 Comments    Print Print   

Ok, maybe not the most consequential Vandercook query, but this has been nagging at me. I’m currently fixing up my departments’ recently salvaged SP20 (serial #25595), and have noticed that the feed board is ungraduated along the slot which holds the edge guide (missing, of course). In contrast, my SP15 has the customary scale for use with the edge guide in registering paper, and I’m just wondering if this was a common manufacturing variation, and if so, why exactly one would want no scale to measure against? Any thoughts? Also, any clever ideas (i.e. photos) for improvising an edge guide that will provide fine adjustments?

Duncan Dempster
University of Hawaii
Department of Art

Post Details

    Post Title: Feedboard Feedback
    Author: Duncan Dempster
    Filed As: SP series
    Tags:


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
« ID this proof press!
Manual for Uni I (#20234) »

3 comments have been posted on “Feedboard Feedback”.

  1. Fritz Klinke commented:
    October 12, 2006 at 2:49 am

    geeze, that’s a lot of detective work, but at one point I counted something like 13 different options for ordering a SP-15 I found in some Vandercook literature here in the office. Most of these are explained as purchaser options–the change on drive belt was an engineering change order, etc. The form roller support was an add on that could be bought as an after market thing, or installed at the factory–I have a new set in the parts drawers, and it was clearly an effort to improve the inking on this press. The linkage from the foot pedal to the cylinder grippers went through a couple of design changes, from partial cables to solid rods–again, an exercise in engineering that was usually developed because of customer comments (often spelled complaints). I think Vandercook came up with a hasty design, then spent the next few years trying to fix the flaws with various fixes.

  2. Paul Moxon, Moderator commented:
    October 11, 2006 at 1:12 pm

    Duncan: For a clever idea to improvise a *side guide* see Gerald Lange’s blog: http://bielerpressvii.blogspot.com/.

  3. The Arm NYC commented:
    October 10, 2006 at 7:26 am

    My SP15 #21593 doesn’t have the scale on the feed board. I wondered if this might be a feature (among others) that differentiates the SP Test presses from the SP Proof presses. Other differences which I have noticed in the manual (in the SP15s at least) are the gripper opening device (manual shows the Proof press to have a lever off the end of the cylinder shaft and the Test press to have a foot operated lever), the number of end guides and grippers (SP15 Test has four end guides and six grippers, SP15 Proof has two end guides and four grippers), the roller drive motor and belt (SP-15 Proof with X-20956 1/8 HP with V belt vs. the SP-15 Test press X-27175 1/12 HP geared motor with toothed belt X-21723). The SP-15 Test press also has the more advanced ‘bearer controlled form roller support’ with the nylon rollers X-24565. With this information I would speculate that the Test presses were more advanced and more expensive than the Proof presses.
    Fritz – is there any pricing information or other documentation to back this up?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Connect

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Comments RSS

Archives

Donate

Categories

17 & 25 (Comp room cylinders) 219 OS 320/325 2009 Centennial Accessories Advertising Bearings Blogging Buying & Moving Challenge Cylinder gears/racks Drawsheet & Packing Equipment Fabrication Form rollers/gears For Sale General Gravity (0, 01, 03, 099) Grippers Hacker History Impression Cylinder Ink drum Inking System Lockup Bar Lubrication Manuals Motors Moving No. 1 No. 3 No. 4 & 215 Oscillator/Worm Gear Other Brands People Potter Power Carriage Press Bed Print/Trip Lever Reprex Restoration SP series Universal series Value/Price Wanted

Tags

"form rollers" "Universal I" "Universal III" Advertising belt pulley Centenary cores Cylinder dd-vandercook extension block Form rollers/gears for sale fr-vandercook Fritz Klinke John Horn lock-up bar Lubrication Moving MR-110 No. 1 oil packing press for sale print/trip proofs Reprex flat bed riders sp-15 sp15 sp20 speed reducer string stripping Switches Towson undercut universal II vandercook vandercook 4 Vandercook SP15 Wanted Wash-up worm worm gear

Archives

  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
© 2012 Vanderblog | Entries (RSS) | WordPress and Tweaker2