<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dust Cover Repair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2006/12/20/dust-cover-repair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2006/12/20/dust-cover-repair/</link>
	<description>»A forum for flatbed cylinder proof presses</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fritz Klinke</title>
		<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2006/12/20/dust-cover-repair/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz Klinke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/?p=113#comment-364</guid>
		<description>I have the Vandercook forms for most or all of the plexiglass dust covers and have been contemplating making the more popular ones available again, like SP-15 and Univ I. It's just one of many projects waiting in line, as well as the cloth dust covers. The dust covers are a bother at times, but serve their purpose of keeping floating crap in the air from landing on the rollers while the press is in use. Schools view these as safety items for keeping student's hands, hair, and clothing from getting taken up in the rollers, and safety is one of their paramount concerns. 

The plastic dust covers were an optional item, and had to be specified when the order was placed. The cloth dust covers were also optional, and in later years, Vandercook had a cheap attack and started making them out of plastic. I have a prototype one underway where the Vandercook world logo would be in the center in stitchery, but I went overboard and made the trial one too big with a ton of stitches--looks nice, but costs way too much to produce. Vandercook did use a stitched logo in the 40s and 50s, but it was simple and reasonably small with the word Vandercook stitched with a simple border around it--in those days, the only source was from uniform companies, and that's who made them for Vandercook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the Vandercook forms for most or all of the plexiglass dust covers and have been contemplating making the more popular ones available again, like SP-15 and Univ I. It&#8217;s just one of many projects waiting in line, as well as the cloth dust covers. The dust covers are a bother at times, but serve their purpose of keeping floating crap in the air from landing on the rollers while the press is in use. Schools view these as safety items for keeping student&#8217;s hands, hair, and clothing from getting taken up in the rollers, and safety is one of their paramount concerns. </p>

<p>The plastic dust covers were an optional item, and had to be specified when the order was placed. The cloth dust covers were also optional, and in later years, Vandercook had a cheap attack and started making them out of plastic. I have a prototype one underway where the Vandercook world logo would be in the center in stitchery, but I went overboard and made the trial one too big with a ton of stitches&#8211;looks nice, but costs way too much to produce. Vandercook did use a stitched logo in the 40s and 50s, but it was simple and reasonably small with the word Vandercook stitched with a simple border around it&#8211;in those days, the only source was from uniform companies, and that&#8217;s who made them for Vandercook.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Brooks</title>
		<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2006/12/20/dust-cover-repair/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 01:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/?p=113#comment-302</guid>
		<description>affordable is good, free is better. I have more time than money so I go that route. 

I like the dust cover for keeping paper dust out of the ink while printing.

works for me, but thanks for your thoughts.
-alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>affordable is good, free is better. I have more time than money so I go that route. </p>

<p>I like the dust cover for keeping paper dust out of the ink while printing.</p>

<p>works for me, but thanks for your thoughts.<br />
-alex</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Arm NYC</title>
		<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2006/12/20/dust-cover-repair/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>The Arm NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 18:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/?p=113#comment-301</guid>
		<description>That's a good point, Paul.  I think a dust cover for the whole press like the canvas ones that Vandercook used to make would be much more useful.  They serve to keep the whole press clean when its not in use and then get the heck out of the way when its time to print.  
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/72/173337641_97d964e356.jpg

Daniel Morris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point, Paul.  I think a dust cover for the whole press like the canvas ones that Vandercook used to make would be much more useful.  They serve to keep the whole press clean when its not in use and then get the heck out of the way when its time to print.  <br />
<a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/72/173337641_97d964e356.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://farm1.static.flickr.com/72/173337641_97d964e356.jpg</a></p>

<p>Daniel Morris</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Moxon, Moderator</title>
		<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2006/12/20/dust-cover-repair/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Moxon, Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/?p=113#comment-300</guid>
		<description>You're right, Daniel, a dust cover would be a simple bend.  I have had more complicated one-off point of sale racks made at reasonable prices. 

Personally though, I wouldn't bother. I prefer to have an unobstructed view of the inked rollers so that I can immediately see any anomoly that appears on the surface: a heavy spot of ink, a sliver of makeready or polymer or a build-up of paper fluff  during a long run using a mouldmade sheet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Daniel, a dust cover would be a simple bend.  I have had more complicated one-off point of sale racks made at reasonable prices. </p>

<p>Personally though, I wouldn&#8217;t bother. I prefer to have an unobstructed view of the inked rollers so that I can immediately see any anomoly that appears on the surface: a heavy spot of ink, a sliver of makeready or polymer or a build-up of paper fluff  during a long run using a mouldmade sheet.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Arm NYC</title>
		<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2006/12/20/dust-cover-repair/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>The Arm NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 23:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/?p=113#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Any plastics machining shop should be able to remake this part using heat and a bending form if you have the original for them to take the measurements from.  I have used Maritime Plastics in Eastport, Maryland for this and they produced the part I needed with good results.

Daniel Morris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any plastics machining shop should be able to remake this part using heat and a bending form if you have the original for them to take the measurements from.  I have used Maritime Plastics in Eastport, Maryland for this and they produced the part I needed with good results.</p>

<p>Daniel Morris</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Moxon, Moderator</title>
		<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2006/12/20/dust-cover-repair/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Moxon, Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/?p=113#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Plastics dust covers were standard on Universal and SP series presses except the SP13, which has a separate inking carriage similiar to the kind sold as an option on some early models such as the 15, the 20, and the 32 (c.1914-26) 

Other later models with plastics dust covers were the 15-20 and 15-21, (both released in 1955), the 425 (1958) and the 319 (1960). I am not aware of any other models that have them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plastics dust covers were standard on Universal and SP series presses except the <span class="caps">SP13, </span>which has a separate inking carriage similiar to the kind sold as an option on some early models such as the 15, the 20, and the 32 (c.1914-26) </p>

<p>Other later models with plastics dust covers were the 15-20 and 15-21, (both released in 1955), the 425 (1958) and the 319 (1960). I am not aware of any other models that have them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
