<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Model 17</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2007/02/17/model-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2007/02/17/model-17/</link>
	<description>»A forum for flatbed cylinder proof presses</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Whitley</title>
		<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2007/02/17/model-17/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Whitley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 02:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/?p=170#comment-459</guid>
		<description>Paul,

This ad made me go dig out my (very few) copies of old printing magazines - in the January 20, 1923 issue of "The American Printer", the advertiser's index lists "Vandercook Press" as having an ad on page 16 of the (previous) January 5 issue - naturally that is an issue I don't have - so did they use "The Vandercook Press" and "Vandercook and Sons" concurrently for a while?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>

<p>This ad made me go dig out my (very few) copies of old printing magazines - in the January 20, 1923 issue of &#8220;The American Printer&#8221;, the advertiser&#8217;s index lists &#8220;Vandercook Press&#8221; as having an ad on page 16 of the (previous) January 5 issue - naturally that is an issue I don&#8217;t have - so did they use &#8220;The Vandercook Press&#8221; and &#8220;Vandercook and Sons&#8221; concurrently for a while?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
