• About
    • Posting
    • Media Mentions
    • Desiderata
  • History
    • Vandercook Timeline
    • Vandercook Employee Roster
      • Employee Photos
    • Vandercook Dealers
    • Centenary Gallery
      • Bundle Participants
    • Genealogy
  • Literature
    • Book
    • Articles
      • A Short History of Vandercook
      • The Vandercook Archive
      • The Vandercook in Context
      • Common Vandercook Operator Errors
      • Edition Printing on the Cylinder Proof Press
      • Adjusting Cylinder Carriage Bearings …
      • Cleanliness Will Cut the Costs
      • Lock-Up
    • Vandercook Patents
    • Bibliography
  • Tables
    • Model Index
    • Quick Specs
    • Features
    • Serial Numbers
    • Press Inspectors
  • Maintenance
    • Workshops
    • Presses for Sale
      • Links
    • Glossary
  • Census
    • Vandercook Gravity Press Census
  • Other Brands
    • Other Brands Censuses
      • Asbern Census
      • Canuck Census
      • Challenge Census
        • Challenge Patents
      • Hacker Census
        • Hacker Patents
      • FAG Census
      • Korrex Census
      • Potter Census
      • Reprex Census
      • Western Census
  • Contact
« T-Shirt for 100 Years of Vandercook (?)
Universal 1 hand trip issue »

Suggestions on which press to buy

Posted July 12, 2009 by Courtney Jacques   930 views    3 Comments    Print Print   

Hello All,
I own a custom invitation business and have been sending my work out to a press. I would like to purchase my own press and begin doing my own printing. I have a fairly large studio so I am not really worried about size. I do mostly short runs of 100-200 invitations, printing the envelope, invitation, rsvp card, info card, and save the date for each one. I am mostly interested in quality, spot on registration, and even ink distribution. I have been researching Chandler and Price clamshell presses but recently read on this site that a Vandercook could offer a higher quality print. As for cleaning, maintenance, and printing, is there one or two models that are better than others? Thank you for your time.
Courtney

Post Details

    Post Title: Suggestions on which press to buy
    Author: Courtney Jacques
    Filed As: General
    Tags:


    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
« T-Shirt for 100 Years of Vandercook (?)
Universal 1 hand trip issue »

3 comments have been posted on “Suggestions on which press to buy”.

  1. Paul Moxon, Moderator commented:
    July 15, 2009 at 7:44 am

    Most suitable would be the SP15, Universal I, and the No. 4.
    Other brands to consider are the Challenge 15MP, Reprex No. 2, 3 & 4. and the Asbern ADR-1

    The larger SP20, Universal III, 15-21 and 219 Vandercooks would also work.

    The problem, of course, is locating any of these presses and then discerning their condition. Any press you’ll find will be at least 35 years old.

  2. Courtney Jacques commented:
    July 15, 2009 at 2:18 am

    Thank you so much Paul for the insight! The Universal sizes in the spec chart sound like they would work great. Printing wise, what is the best Vandercook for printing invitations you think? Thank you again.

  3. Paul Moxon, Moderator commented:
    July 14, 2009 at 8:40 am

    Universal and SP series Vandercooks have the easiest inking system to clean.
    The large oscillating roller is hinged on the carriage and is raised to access the rubber form rollers. On earlier models such as the No.4 or 219 the oscillating roller must be lifted off the press to clean the rollers.

    The roller height adjustment of Universals and SPs is simpler to make than on earlier models, but the position needs to be monitored because the mechanism is lighter than the roller frame on earlier models, which when locked holds better.

    Generally, the ink motor on Universals and SPs need the oil levels to be checked much less frequently than on earlier models.

    There are other considerations such as matching your body size to a press. If you are tall you might find that an SP15 is too low and hard on your back, or if you are short a 219 might be too large and hard on your shoulder. Of course, a press could be placed on blocks, but this makes accessing the foot pedal awkward as does placing a platform to stand on.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Connect

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Comments RSS

Archives

Donate

Categories

17 & 25 (Comp room cylinders) 219 OS 320/325 2009 Centennial Accessories Advertising Bearings Blogging Buying & Moving Challenge Cylinder gears/racks Drawsheet & Packing Equipment Fabrication Form rollers/gears For Sale General Gravity (0, 01, 03, 099) Grippers Hacker History Impression Cylinder Ink drum Inking System Lockup Bar Lubrication Manuals Motors Moving No. 1 No. 3 No. 4 & 215 Oscillator/Worm Gear Other Brands People Potter Power Carriage Press Bed Print/Trip Lever Reprex Restoration SP series Universal series Value/Price Wanted

Tags

"form rollers" "Universal I" "Universal III" Advertising belt pulley Centenary cores Cylinder dd-vandercook extension block Form rollers/gears for sale fr-vandercook Fritz Klinke John Horn lock-up bar Lubrication Moving MR-110 No. 1 oil packing press for sale print/trip proofs Reprex flat bed riders sp-15 sp15 sp20 speed reducer string stripping Switches Towson undercut universal II vandercook vandercook 4 Vandercook SP15 Wanted Wash-up worm worm gear

Archives

  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
© 2012 Vanderblog | Entries (RSS) | WordPress and Tweaker2