<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Universal I Hand and Door Width Requirement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2010/05/universal-hand-and-door-width-requirement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2010/05/universal-hand-and-door-width-requirement/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=universal-hand-and-door-width-requirement</link>
	<description>A forum for all brands of flatbed cylinder proof presses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Moxon, Moderator</title>
		<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2010/05/universal-hand-and-door-width-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-3125</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Moxon, Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 23:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/?p=4581#comment-3125</guid>
		<description>Comments closed, because of Spam. Please start a new post if interested in this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comments closed, because of Spam. Please start a new post if interested in this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha Chiplis</title>
		<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2010/05/universal-hand-and-door-width-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-3111</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha Chiplis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 21:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/?p=4581#comment-3111</guid>
		<description>I think it would definitely be a squeaker, and could easily end up on the &#039;not fitting&#039; side which would be bad. I was looking at the pedal and wondering if it was easy to remove, so I will check into that now. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would definitely be a squeaker, and could easily end up on the &#8216;not fitting&#8217; side which would be bad. I was looking at the pedal and wondering if it was easy to remove, so I will check into that now. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Moxon, Moderator</title>
		<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2010/05/universal-hand-and-door-width-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-3110</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Moxon, Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 20:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/?p=4581#comment-3110</guid>
		<description>Thinking a bit more on this: removing the door frame would gain two inches. Of course you&#039;ll have removed the crank handle, but check if the gripper pedal and gripper trip lever on the back side need to be removed. The later is not that complicated to take apart, but the pedal has a taper pin that is hard to access. 

Martha mentioned in an email that most of the basements she looked at have 6 steps down and a 90 degree turn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking a bit more on this: removing the door frame would gain two inches. Of course you&#8217;ll have removed the crank handle, but check if the gripper pedal and gripper trip lever on the back side need to be removed. The later is not that complicated to take apart, but the pedal has a taper pin that is hard to access. </p>
<p>Martha mentioned in an email that most of the basements she looked at have 6 steps down and a 90 degree turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha Chiplis</title>
		<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2010/05/universal-hand-and-door-width-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-3109</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha Chiplis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/?p=4581#comment-3109</guid>
		<description>Thanks for confirming that, Paul. On widening the doorway, my architect sister said she &#039;doesn&#039;t think it would be easy due to the masonry opening but it might be worth getting an estimate on.&#039; There are concrete steps, so that would be an issue as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for confirming that, Paul. On widening the doorway, my architect sister said she &#8216;doesn&#8217;t think it would be easy due to the masonry opening but it might be worth getting an estimate on.&#8217; There are concrete steps, so that would be an issue as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Moxon, Moderator</title>
		<link>http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/2010/05/universal-hand-and-door-width-requirement/comment-page-1/#comment-3106</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Moxon, Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vandercookpress.info/vanderblog/?p=4581#comment-3106</guid>
		<description>31&quot; is too narrow for your Uni I. Is it an option to expand the opening and reframe? Current standard exterior doors are 36&quot;wide. Big box stores sells them for about $200 depending on the model, add another $50-75 for locks. Professional install is an additional $200, well worth it if you don&#039;t have the skills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>31&#8243; is too narrow for your Uni I. Is it an option to expand the opening and reframe? Current standard exterior doors are 36&#8243;wide. Big box stores sells them for about $200 depending on the model, add another $50-75 for locks. Professional install is an additional $200, well worth it if you don&#8217;t have the skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

