So my 219 OS struggles continue and I wanted to give an update and hopefully get some more information. As discussed in this post: https://vandercookpress.info/2012/05/219-os-carriage-latch-question/ the wooden carriage latch had worn away enough that it wasn’t holding the cylinder carriage back at the feedboard. After some time, I came to the conclusion that it was contributing to registration issues I’ve been having with the press, due to their being wear on the rails at the feedboard which cause the paper to be a bit off in one direction or another depending on the exact location of the carriage when grippers are lowered.

As of this week, I should finally have a replacement wooden block. I was worried about the spring that holds the block but realized I could just take off the entire unit and replace the block without unscrewing the spring.

That should help. I also noticed two more things, in the middle of the springs that stop the cylinder when coming back to the feedboard is a wooden stop with a set screw, and on the carriage itself, where it would hit the springs, there’s a piece of metal screwed in.

I think it’s not enough make sure the wooden stop holds the cylinder back, but with that metal strip adding material to the where the springs hit, it helps make sure the cylinder is pushed forward enough against the stop, so in the end, it has a consistent and secure position. I’ve attached photos below of the wooden stop, and the metal bar (with some makeshift paper we put on to see if it would help, it did).

Finally, the realization of why this was effecting registration so much…when the cylinder is in the middle of the press bed, there is no lateral play or wear, it is pretty tight. But when it’s back at the feedboard, you can easily jerk it the equivalent of a point pivoted one way or another. You can also feel wear to the bottom of the rail where the impression wheel rests. If the impression wheel is tightened back their so it wouldn’t move, it would be too tight for the rest of the printing cycle. This play is most noticeable when the cylinder latch and springs aren’t holding the carriage at a set position, I think. The only differences I can tell of the the carriage at the feedboard vs along the bed is the wear to the rail, but also the lack of the gear that turns the rollers, does that help keep the cylinder bearer from moving laterally?

What I wonder is…is it possible to build up the rails back at the feedboard? I know it’s not advisable to do it along the press bed because you’ll get inconsistent inking, but back at the feedboard the rollers aren’t over the form yet. I was wondering about something like Devcon Liquid Steel applied to the bottom rail a bit back at the feedboard. If that wear is causing the problem of too much play, then it seems like that may be a solution.

If the design is such that it’s actually the roller rail that keeps the cylinder from moving, then my only hope is that by fixing the carriage latch it will keep things in a consistent position when feeding.

Once again, thanks for reading my excessive post and please let me know if you have any thoughts or suggestions, if any of my inferences are wrong, etc. All help is much appreciated!

The first picture show the wooden stopper between the springs. You can see where it was painted over, we brought it out a bit. The second picture is the metal bar on the carriage that hits the springs. Seems “aftermarket” to me. Our taping paper on helped keep the carriage far enough forward so it was less likely to do that pivot that was causing the registration issue.

6869


Warning: Attempt to read property "content" on int in /home/p4ulm0x0n/public_html/vandercookpress.info/wp-content/plugins/nextgen-gallery/products/photocrati_nextgen/modules/third_party_compat/module.third_party_compat.php on line 490

Warning: Attempt to read property "content" on int in /home/p4ulm0x0n/public_html/vandercookpress.info/wp-content/plugins/nextgen-gallery/products/photocrati_nextgen/modules/third_party_compat/module.third_party_compat.php on line 490

5 thoughts on “219 OS Carriage latch follow up/rails question”

  1. I don’t understand where the 4 bearings are on the 219os. I see them in diagrams for the new style, but on the old style, there’s just the two big impression wheels under the rail, and the 4 trip wheels on top. Are the 4 on top what you refer to as the carriage bearings? I’ve been told repeatedly that these should spin freely while in print. They do not hug the rails tightly laterally and when at the feedboard with the carriage latch worn or removed, you can easily pivot the entire carriage and see it rock against the upper wheels.

    We put a new wooden block on the carriage latch, and played with the settings. There are two bolts, one determines the height and the other the tension on the spring. It’s difficult to know the correct setting, it has to have enough give that the carriage just rolls over it and comes to rest at the feedboard, but not so much that you have to really crank it.

    We also put a bit of metal behind one of the feedboard springs, which pushes the carriage a bit forward against where the latch is holding it. It’s now coming to rest at a consistent position.

    We adjusted the eccentric, it was spinning freely while in print, that was definitely wrong. I applied the PB blaster, waited and got it to move, tightened it until the impression on both sides of the bed looked the same. Just saw an old comment from Paul about using a feeler gauge to make sure there’s .003″ clearance when in print, here: http://www.briarpress.org/27592

    I’m not sure I understand that, wouldn’t they spin freely if there’s clearance?

    But as we’ve tightened them now, the carriage bearings are not spinning while in print on the bed or at the feedboard. But there is wear at the feedboard. Before it was spinning all the way, at one point it was tight in the middle of the bed, but spinning loose at the feedboard, that’s why I thought the problem was wear to the rail back there, which is why I was asking about liquid steel to build up the rail and ensure contact at the feedboard.

  2. I’ve never seen a carriage shift on arc or diagonal, except on a couple SP-15s. Maybe they’d been disassembled and reassembled carelessly, a bad practice.
    The carriage rests on four cylinder bearings at the feedboard, and then there are the cylinder gears on the operator side. Also roller gears on the far side. Many points of contact, inertia alone should prevent random movement when at rest at the feedboard. At a wild guess, maybe the carriage bearings are misadjusted, less contact, maybe even rocking?
    I will repeat, when carriage and impression bearings are correctly adjusted, the rollers will not change height-to-form on front and back strokes.

  3. Thanks for the response.

    The carriage bearings spin freely, from prior discussions I’ve understood that these should not be tight.

    The impression bearing however, was spinning freely at the feedboard, but tight at the middle of the print bed…until it wasn’t. That’s why I started to try to adjust it again, it was enough out of wack that it wasn’t holding during the print run and I couldn’t adjust it until I sprayed it and worked it loose. It is now able to be adjusted. As mentioned, this happened before.

    I initially believe what you mention, that it doesn’t matter where the cylinder rests at the feedboard because it’s the gears and guides (and feeding) that is responsible for registration, and Fritz had told me the same some time ago. HOWEVER, when the carriage is back at the feedboard, it is loose and there’s a subtle pivot. Where the carriage is in that pivot dictates the angle that the paper is hitting the side guide at. Believe me, I though I was just feeding it wrong, until I got two other relatively seasoned printers to come over and run through the press and they experienced the same problem. That was before I noticed the pivot.

    This isn’t fishtailing/sagging etc. This is the crop marks shifting a point when an inch away from the grippers.

    I initially thought the pivot existed because the wooden stop had worn down. I’ve just replaced that and hope that will help, but am not sure if that’s the only thing that keeps it in the right place when it’s back at the feedboard. That’s why I thought one of the other two issues (the metal bar that hits the springs and the impression bearings) might be relevant.

    Assuming the impression bearings are adjusted correctly in the middle of the print bed, should they turn freely while at the feedboard? I though it would already be in print and be tight, which would remove this pivoting play.

    I’ll shoot some video soon so you can see. When in the middle of the press bed while on print, there is not lateral motion of the carriage, it is tight, but when you bring it back to the feedboard, if you go all the way back, the whole thing can easily pivot or rotate by a tiny bit. You can feel when it gets back far enough for the pivot, which is why I wondered if in addition to the latch holding the carriage back, the springs need to push the carriage out. As mentioned, there’s a metal bar attached to the back of the carriage that wasn’t there before, and between the springs, and adjustable wooden block.

    Any more thoughts are much appreciated.

  4. There are carriage bearings that support the whole carriage when on trip, and impression bearings that hold the cylinder down when on impression. Each has its settings done when in effect, and when correctly set, the rollers will be at the same height whether on trip or print. What the impression bearings do at the feedboard is irrelevant because they are not engaged then, and what the carriage bearings do on impression is also irrelevant. Overtightening these bearings at random is a bad idea.
    I doubt either setting has any effect on registration, because the paper guides and the gears are the mechanisms at work there. It doesn’t matter exactly where the cylinder rests relative to the feedboard IF you are feeding CONSISTANTLY to the guides, but much possibility of error at that point, and in how the sheet moves through the print cycle (sagging into blank areas, fishtailing etc.). The form has an exact position relative to the bed, the bed has an exact position relative to the bed gears, the cylinder gears contact them exactly on the forward print stroke, and the paper guides have an exact position relative to the cylinder gears. Hand and paper lack these exact relationships.
    The 219OS has an additional adjustment of cylinder to carriage, with near adjustment hidden behind the name plate on the carriage. Today, this is pretty much unknown territory: can’t advise.

  5. I’m going to make my already confusing post even more so. Now in the middle of the bed, the impression wheel on the operator side is spinning freely while in print. It may not just be rail wear at the feedboard that’s making it loose, but the entire bearing being out of adjustment. I’ve started to try to adjust it and it’s stuck, similar to what happened the first time I tried to adjust the impression bearings.

    https://vandercookpress.info/219-os-eccentric-and-rail-questions/

    Now I’ve reapplied PB Blaster in hopes of loosening up the eccentric so I can adjust it again.

Leave a Comment